User talk:FK270673

Power Maps

See you added some power maps of the USA. I and a few others have been working on the power network of South Africa. If you have a chance it would be great if you could do a rendering of South Africa, alternatively I'll likely get to it later. Geofabrik has a South Africa extract available. -- Firefishy 17:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to keep the maps updated. Any chance you could include power=pole (for use in power=minor_lines)? I've started to add quite a few to Northern Kentucky, and it'd be great to see the lines visualized. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 10:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

2011

landuse=orchard

Hallo,

würde es Dir was ausmachen, das fruit=* von der Seite Tag:landuse=orchard zu entfernen? Steht dort unter "other tags" und ist soweit ich das sehe doppelt im vgl. zu "produce". -- Dieterdreist 16:26, 11 April 2011 (BST)

Power generation proposal

Hi,

Thank you for your involvement in my proposal. I would prefer we use the Talk page now, it will be easier for both of us :)

Regards,

--Don-vip 13:49, 4 June 2011 (BST)

Hi again. Sorry to insist, but could you discuss first before adding anything to my proposal ? We are far from reaching a consensus on the way tagging transformers.

--Don-vip 15:56, 13 June 2011 (BST)

Très bon Français :) I cannot do the same in german :) It's not about not taking your comments into account, I appreciate greatly your ideas and the interest you find in my proposal :) It's just I would prefer to use the talk page for that, at least until I finish all I want to put into my proposal. --Don-vip 12:08, 14 June 2011 (BST)

Änderung von Spannungslevel

Hallo FK270673, als Wikipedianer bin ich gewohnt, solche Änderungen nur belegt durchzuführen. Deshalb die Frage wo stammen die Werte her denn weder 100 kV nboch 150 kV sind eine Kleinigkeit. Wobei ich mich da nicht einmal auf Wikipedia verlassen würde, denn in jeder ist es sehr spachabhängig vom jeweiligen Land abhängig und da bestehen auch Europaweit noch große Unterschiede. und beim englischen Artikel ist sowieso nur ein Beipiel aus USA dabei ;-) --gruß aus dem D-A-CH gebiet K@rl (talk) 10:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis! Es gab mindestens einen Mapper, der stur alle 110-kV-Umspannwerke als substation=transmission eingetragen hat, weil das so im Wiki steht. Gerade in Deutschland, Österreich und allen östlich gelegenen Ländern (Polen, Russland, Tschechien) dienen die 110-KV-Umspannwerke aber zur Versorgung eines lokalen Stromnetzes, so dass substation=distribution richtig wäre. In den USA gibt es Umspannwerke zur lokalen Versorgung mit 69kV (alt, wird aus Kostengründen aber nicht so schnell erneuert), 115kV (bestimmte Stromanbieter im Nordosten, Süden und Westen) und 138kV (bestimmte Stromanbieter in Ballungsgebieten, u.a. Chicago, New York und Texas, bei Neubauten üblich). Manchmal dient das 138kV-Umspannwerk direkt zur Versorgung des lokalen Stromnetzes, manchmal sind auch lokale Stadtwerke mit 69kV dazwischengeschaltet. In Südafrika und anderen, ehemals englischen Kolonien gibt es 132-kV-Umspannwerke zur lokalen Versorgung, aber auch eine Vielzahl historisch gewachsener Ausnahmen. Für deutschsprachige Mapper ist es eine praktikable Unterscheidung, wenn 110-kV-Umpannwerke als substation=distribution und 220-kV-Umspannwerke als substation=transmission eingetragen werden. Der Bereich zwischen 150kV und 200kV wird international eher selten genutzt, vor allem in Japan und Korea (154kV), aber auch von der Tennessee Valley Authority in den USA (161kV). Die Tennessee Valley Authority beliefert diverse Stadtwerke, daher ist die Frage, ob TVA-Umspannwerke als distribution oder transmission eingetragen werden, ein heikler Grenzfall. --FK270673 (talk) 21:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Danke für die Ausführlcihe Erklärung, ist interessant, da ich es im Detail nicht so wusste. gruß K@rl (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Einladung zur ÖPNV-Mappingparty am 3.9.16 ab 10:30h im Hackerspace Bremen

Hallo FK270673,

wir möchten dich zu ÖPNV-Mappingparty am 3.9.16 ab 10:30h im Hackerspace Bremen einladen. Weitere Informationen dazu in Kürze auf http://osm-bremen.de oder im Wiki

Viele Grüße --Raffael (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:Brake-Bahnhofstrasse.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified January 2022}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Licences

You uploaded several photos without stating their licenses, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mateusz_Konieczny/notify_uploaders/FK270673&oldid=2295231

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:OHZ-K2-Neuenkirchen.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|FK270673}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)